Fluor Daniel to pay $12 million for antiunion hiring practices
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contacts: Mike Stapp, Attorney Francis J. Martorana, Attorney Fluor Daniel to pay $12 million for antiunion hiring practicesSettlement resolves two decades of litigation, largest case of its kindKANSAS CITY, KS, October 14, 2009 — Four construction unions announced today they have reached a record-setting settlement with Fluor Daniel Inc. over the company’s practice of discriminating against union organizers who apply for work. Under terms of the agreement, Fluor Daniel will pay $12 million in back pay and interest, which will be allocated to 167 union members who were victims of hiring discrimination. Individual members will receive between $8,000 and $217,000. The settlement agreement resolves multiple cases brought before the National Labor Relations Board dating back to the early 1990s by the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers, and Helpers; the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; and the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry. The United Brotherhood of Carpenters also is party to the litigation as an intervener. The unions charged that Fluor Daniel intentionally refused to hire qualified union members to work on utility maintenance projects in Kentucky and Arizona, and on an Exxon refinery job in Louisiana. Presidents of the four unions joined together in issuing this statement: “This settlement is unprecedented for this type of case. It is the largest in terms of back pay, and it is the longest. The combined cases took nearly 20 years to litigate through the Labor Board and the appeals process. Today marks a huge victory for the union construction trades — and for the individuals who were unfairly treated by Fluor Daniel. “Sadly, more than a dozen of the discriminatees have passed on in the years since these charges were filed, illustrating the need for labor law reform in the United States, beginning with passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. The legal right of workers to organize is routinely abused. It should never take two decades for workers to receive justice under the law.” Relevant legal filings by unions and rulings of the NLRB and Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Case Reference: Fluor Daniel II (Big Rivers Electric Company power generating facilities, Kentucky); NLRB Region 26-Memphis
Case Reference: Fluor Daniel III (Exxon refinery, Baton Rouge, La., and Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Wintersburg, Ariz.); NLRB Regions 15-New Orleans and 28-Phoenix
|